UPDATE: Fla. Gov. Scott calls welfare drug testing ruling "disturbing" - Tallahassee News | ABC 27 WTXL: News

UPDATE: Fla. Gov. Scott calls welfare drug testing ruling "disturbing"

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:34 am | Updated: 12:40 pm, Tue Feb 26, 2013.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Governor Rick Scott will appeal welfare drug testing to the Supreme Court, according to a statement he made Tuesday afternoon. 

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta upheld a ban of the controversial measure.

Governor Scott issued the following response:

“The court’s ruling today is disturbing. Welfare is 100 percent about helping children. Welfare is taxpayer money to help people looking for jobs who have children. Drug use by anyone with children looking for a job is totally destructive. This is fundamentally about protecting the well-being of Florida families. We will protect children and families in our state, and this decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court.”


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) - A federal appeals court has upheld a temporary ban on a law requiring drug testing of Florida welfare recipients.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta on Tuesday ruled that a lower court was right to temporarily halt enforcement of the drug-testing program. The opinion said the state of Florida hadn't shown a "substantial special need" for such mandatory drug testing.

Florida officials have argued that testing is necessary because it would deter drug use by those receiving welfare. Opponents say drug testing as a condition of getting welfare benefits is an unconstitutional search and seizure.

Tuesday's opinion was authored by Circuit Judge Rosemary Barkett. She was the first woman to sit on the Florida Supreme Court and was the state's first female Chief Justice.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Just Jane posted at 11:53 am on Tue, Feb 26, 2013.

    Just Jane Posts: 3

    Aside from the illegal search and seizure issue, didn't we already learn that this was not cost effective? The tiny number of positive results ended with our tax payer dollars being wasted. It cost the program far more than it would ever saved. A follow up story where those numbers are broken down would be a good thing to show the readers here. First, the term "welfare" is being lump in this article. That's misleading. Each program has it's own qualifications. Each program has it's own requirements. For those I've known who receive cash payments for a child in their home which is the primary program this was aimed toward, are not people who are out spending money on illicit drugs. Example being a grandparents raising a grandchild when the parent is absent. . This takes time, gathering paperwork, completing lengthy applications, interviews, documentation, meeting deadlines and plenty of follow up. I've not met 1 person I know who had a drug issues who would go to this much effort.